Entity · Concept

Textual harmonization

A reference page linking a name, group, or concept to the materials that discuss it.

Aligning parallel passages through additions or changes; may be deliberate editing, not proof of a copyist’s identity.

Modern comparison of harmonization in 4QDeutⁿ, following VanderKam p.20. Does not reproduce the fragment or equate this witness with every Samaritan reading
Modern comparison of harmonization in 4QDeutⁿ, following VanderKam p.20. Does not reproduce the fragment or equate this witness with every Samaritan readingIL Archive · original diagram · CC BYImage source

Text

Details can move between command and fulfilment or between parallel accounts. Ulrich explains recurring expansions in some Exodus/Numbers witnesses, beyond spelling mistakes. [1]

The diagram presents Sabbath rationales in 4QDeutⁿ from Deuteronomy5:15 and Exodus20:11. It does not match SP everywhere; harmonistic describes a procedure, not a copyist’s sect. [2]

References and notes

  1. Eugene Ulrich (2012). “The Evolutionary Composition of the Hebrew Bible.” In Editing the Bible, pp. 23–40. SBL. Pp.32,34: Exodus additions from Deuteronomy and explicit fulfilment of commands; 4QNumᵇ. Ulrich identifies editorial editions; not automatically every scribe’s practice. Return to the text ↑
  2. James C. VanderKam (2016). “Texts, titles, and translations,” pp.18–20: examples from Samuel and Deuteronomy. Pp.18–20: Samuel and 4QDeutⁿ harmonization of Sabbath rationales, Exodus20:11/Deuteronomy5:15. Greek agreement does not automatically identify a better reading. Return to the text ↑

Research history

Substantive changes are retained here. Minor copy edits remain in the internal operational log.

  1. Edition 2 · 11 October 2026 · editor:aladmin

    Substantive record update

    Read this revision in its original language (Arabic)

Suggest a correction · Suggest a source for this record

Cite this record

IL Archive, «Textual harmonization», Edition 2, https://ilarchive.com/en/entities/harmonization